The Most Absurdly Preposterous Doctrine in All of Christianity: The Harpazo (Rapture)
A study of Old Testament references to the Rapture
Let’s be honest: the idea of the rapture sounds completely ridiculous.
Christians standing around one moment, then poof! They suddenly vanish into thin air while the rest of humanity is left scratching their heads. Pilots disappearing from cockpits mid-flight? Surgeons evaporating during operations? Children snatched from their beds while confused parents frantically search their homes?
It sounds like bad science fiction. It’s the stuff of Left Behind novels and disaster movies. No wonder skeptics roll their eyes. No wonder many sincere Christians reject it outright. No wonder even within evangelical circles there are vigorous debates about whether this doctrine is biblical at all, and if so, when it happens in relation to the tribulation period.
The rapture— or more precisely, the harpazo (ἁρπάζω), the Greek term meaning “to seize, snatch away, or catch up” —is perhaps the single most preposterous concept in all of Christian theology.
And yet, much like quantum theory in the realm of physics— where particles can be in two places at once, where observation changes reality, where the universe operates according to principles that defy everything we thought we knew —the harpazo has just one thing going for it:
It’s undeniably true.
At least, that’s my conviction after years of wrestling with the text. But I’m not here to sell you my views. I don’t believe in proselytizing through intellectual force. What I want to do is lay out the texts— both the Old Testament foundations and the New Testament explicit teaching —so you can do your own research, weigh the evidence for yourself, and come to your own conclusions.
Let me be clear about my approach: I present what I believe Scripture teaches, but I acknowledge there are godly, intelligent scholars who disagree. My goal is to present the biblical data with as little bias as I can while also being transparent about where I land and why.
So let’s begin by addressing the elephant in the room: Why do so many people find the rapture absurd?
If you’re reading this in email, be aware that the text is likely to cut off without warning. For a smoother reading experience and all the features Substack has to offer (including audio voiceovers of my posts), you can go HERE or download the app.
The Skeptic’s Case:
Why the Rapture Seems Ridiculous
1: It’s Not in the Bible
Critics often claim the word “rapture” doesn’t appear in Scripture. And they’re technically correct, as long as you’re reading an English Bible. The English word “rapture” comes from the Latin rapiemur in the Vulgate translation of 1 Thessalonians 4:17, which in turn translates the Greek ἁρπαγησόμεθα (harpagēsometha), “we shall be caught up.”
So yes, the English word “rapture” isn’t in your Bible. Neither is “Trinity,” “incarnation,” or “Bible” itself. Among a whole host of other mainstream doctrinal concepts.
This is a weak objection that confuses terminology with reality.
2: It’s a Recent Invention
Some claim the rapture doctrine was invented by John Nelson Darby in the 1830s or Margaret MacDonald’s alleged “vision.” While Darby certainly systematized and popularized pre-tribulational rapture theology, the core concept— that believers would be caught up to meet Christ —is found all throughout early church writings.
The Didache (c. 70-120 A.D.) speaks of believers being “gathered together” from the earth. The Shepherd of Hermas (c. 140-150 A.D.) describes believers escaping tribulation. Irenaeus (c. 180 A.D.) wrote about the church being “caught up” before the final tribulation.
Whether they had the timing right is debatable. But the idea that believers would be physically removed from earth to meet Christ is ancient, not modern.
3: It’s Just Wishful Thinking
Critics accuse rapture believers of wanting an “escape hatch” from suffering, of theological cowardice masked as hope. And honestly? There’s probably some truth to this criticism in how some present the doctrine.
But this objection cuts both ways. One could equally argue that denying the rapture is wishful thinking by those who prefer a “cleaner” eschatology, or who want to avoid the theological complications the rapture introduces. The real question isn’t what we want to be true, but what Scripture actually teaches.
4: It Contradicts Jesus’ Teaching
Jesus said in John 17:15, “I do not pray that You should take them out of the world, but that You should keep them from the evil one.” Critics argue this precludes a rapture.
But this misunderstands both the prayer and the doctrine. Jesus wasn’t praying about end-times eschatology; He was praying about the disciples’ immediate situation. Moreover, even rapture proponents believe Christians suffer in this world. The rapture is about a specific eschatological event, not general protection from evil.
We recognize that not only is persecution of the church inevitable, but we were promised exactly that by Jesus Himself.
5: The Greek Doesn’t Support It
Some argue that harpazo simply means “gathering” and that Matthew 24:31’s description of angels gathering the elect is the same event as 1 Thessalonians 4:17. Therefore, there’s only one “gathering,” which occurs at the Second Coming, not a separate rapture.
This objection requires us to dig deep into the Greek, which we’ll do shortly.
The Quantum Theory Analogy
Before we examine the biblical evidence, let me explain why I compared the rapture to quantum theory.
Quantum mechanics describes physical reality in ways that seem utterly absurd:
Particles exist in multiple states simultaneously until observed (superposition)
Entangled particles affect each other instantaneously across vast distances (quantum entanglement)
The act of measurement changes what’s being measured (observer effect)
Matter can tunnel through barriers it shouldn’t be able to penetrate (quantum tunneling)
These principles violate our everyday experience, to say nothing of all we thought we knew about physics before we discovered quanta. They make no sense. Yet they are demonstrably, experimentally, repeatedly true. The GPS system in your phone works because scientists account for quantum effects. Computer chips function because engineers harness quantum tunneling.
Physics is weird. Reality is stranger than fiction.
Similarly, the rapture sounds absurd by our everyday standards. Mass disappearances? Instant bodily transformation? Believers caught up in the air? It defies naturalistic expectations.
But the Christian faith is built on things that defy naturalistic expectations: virgin birth, resurrection, miracles, incarnation. If we believe God became man, died, and rose from the dead, is it really such a stretch to believe He might catch up His people to meet Him in the air?
The question isn’t whether it sounds reasonable. There is a lot of sound doctrine that doesn’t sound reasonable (speaking in tongues? Prophesying? Miraculous healing? The Holy Spirit using mere humans to write the Words of God? Come on!) The question is whether Scripture teaches it.
Old Testament Foundations
Patterns and Prophecies
The Hebrew Word Laqach (לָקַח) and the Greek Metatithēmi (μετατίθημι)
Before we encounter the word harpazo in the New Testament, we need to understand its Old Testament precursors. While harpazo itself doesn’t appear in the Septuagint (LXX) in contexts that clearly prefigure the rapture, other Greek words do. And they translate Hebrew concepts that establish the pattern.
Enoch: The First Rapture (Genesis 5:24)
Masoretic Text (MT): “And Enoch walked with God; and he was not, for God took him.”
Hebrew: וְאֵינֶנּוּ כִּי־לָקַח אֹתוֹ אֱלֹהִים (ve-einennu ki-laqach oto Elohim)
The verb laqach (לָקַח) means “to take, receive, fetch”
Septuagint (LXX): “And Enoch was well-pleasing to God, and was not found, because God translated him.”
Greek: καὶ οὐχ εὑρίσκετο, ὅτι μετέθηκεν αὐτὸν ὁ θεός (kai ouch heurisketo, hoti metethēken auton ho theos)
The verb metatithēmi (μετατίθημι) means “to transfer, translate, transport from one place to another”
Significance: The LXX translators chose metatithēmi to capture the idea of Enoch being physically relocated by God. Hebrews 11:5 confirms this: “By faith Enoch was translated (metatithēmi) that he should not see death, and was not found, because God translated him.”
What’s Remarkable: Enoch didn’t die. He “walked with God” (intimate fellowship) for 300 years, then God simply took him. This is the first biblical instance of a living person being removed from earth without experiencing death. This is a clear type (or model) of the rapture.
The Pattern: A righteous person, in the midst of a wicked generation (pre-flood), is removed before judgment falls. Sound familiar?
Elijah: The Second Rapture (2 Kings 2:11)
Masoretic Text (MT): “Then it happened, as they continued on and talked, that suddenly a chariot of fire appeared with horses of fire, and separated the two of them; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven.”
Hebrew: וַיַּעַל אֵלִיָּהוּ בַּסְעָרָה הַשָּׁמָיִם (vaya’al Eliyahu basa’arah hashamayim)
The verb ‘alah (עָלָה) means “to go up, ascend”
Septuagint (LXX): The LXX uses analambanō (ἀναλαμβάνω), meaning “to take up, receive up”
This is the same word used in Acts 1:2, 11, 22 to describe Jesus’ Ascension
The LXX translators recognized Elijah’s departure as a supernatural “taking up”
Significance: Like Enoch, Elijah was taken to heaven without dying, though his departure was far more dramatic, complete with fiery chariots. The text explicitly says he went up “by a whirlwind into heaven” (hashamayim, the heavens, God’s dwelling place).
The Pattern: Again, a righteous prophet, ministering during a time of apostasy (Ahab and Jezebel’s reign), is removed from earth before experiencing death.
Key Difference: Elijah’s removal was witnessed by Elisha, creating a powerful visual of sudden departure that left the observer behind.
Isaiah 26:19-21: Resurrection and Hiding
This passage is perhaps the most explicitly rapture-like prophecy in the Old Testament.
MT vs. LXX Comparison:
Isaiah 26:19 (MT): “Your dead shall live; together with my dead body shall they arise. Awake and sing, you who dwell in dust; for your dew is like the dew of herbs, and the earth shall cast out the dead.”
Isaiah 26:19 (LXX—Brenton’s English Translation): “The dead shall rise, and they that are in the tombs shall be raised, and they that are in the earth shall rejoice: for the dew from thee is healing to them: but the land of the ungodly shall perish.”
Analysis: The MT includes the striking phrase “together with my dead body shall they arise” (עִם־נִבְלָתִי יְקוּמוּן, im-nivlati yequmun). The question is: Whose dead body? Isaiah’s?
Many scholars believe this is the pre-incarnate Christ speaking through Isaiah, saying that the resurrection of believers is connected to “my dead body,” that is, the Messiah’s death and resurrection. This interpretation gains support from 1 Peter 1:11, which says prophets spoke “when testifying beforehand of the sufferings of Christ and the glories that would follow.”
The LXX rendering focuses more on the general resurrection without the personal pronoun, but the essence remains: the dead will rise.
Isaiah 26:20-21 (MT and LXX agree closely):
“Come, my people, enter your chambers, and shut your doors behind you; hide yourself, as it were, for a little moment, until the indignation is past. For behold, the LORD comes out of His place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity; the earth will also disclose her blood, and will no longer cover her slain.”
Significance: The sequence is crucial:
Resurrection of the dead (v. 19)
“Come, my people, enter your chambers,” a summons to God’s people (v. 20a)
“Hide yourself... for a little moment,” temporary protection (v. 20b)
“Until the indignation is past,” duration defined by God’s wrath period (v. 20c)
The LORD comes to punish the earth (v. 21)
This mirrors the rapture sequence in 1 Thessalonians 4:
The dead in Christ rise first
Living believers are “caught up” (raptured)
We meet the Lord “in the air” (heavenly chambers)
We are protected from the coming wrath
Then the Day of the Lord comes upon the earth
The “Chambers” (חֲדָרֶיךָ, chadarecha): This Hebrew word means “inner rooms” or “chambers.” It echoes the Passover, when Israelites entered their homes, shut the doors, and were protected from the angel of death while God’s judgment fell on Egypt. Similarly, believers will be “hidden” in heavenly chambers while God’s wrath falls on earth.
“A Little Moment” (כִּמְעַט־רֶגַע, kimat-rega): This phrase suggests a brief, temporary period often interpreted as corresponding to the tribulation period (understood as seven years, the last half of which Jesus labels “The Great Tribulation”) from heaven’s perspective.
“Until the Indignation is Past” (עַד־יַעֲבֹר זָעַם, ad-ya’avor za’am): The word za’am (זָעַם) means “indignation, wrath, fury.” This is Old Testament language for the eschatological Day of the LORD, which is God’s judgment on the wicked earth.
Key Point: The pattern is: resurrection → removal to chambers → protection during wrath → LORD emerges to judge. This is the rapture in prophetic form.
What Isaiah Knew: Interestingly, Isaiah prophesied this knowing he himself wouldn’t live to see it fulfilled. He was speaking of a future generation— ”my people” in verse 20 —rather than his own contemporaries. This shows that Isaiah, by the Spirit, understood there would be a generation of God’s people who would experience this unique deliverance.
Song of Solomon 2:10-13: “Rise Up, My Love, and Come Away”
This is admittedly more allegorical, and I present it with appropriate caution. The Song of Solomon primarily teaches about marital love, and we shouldn’t force prophetic meaning where it doesn’t exist. However, there’s a long Christian tradition of seeing the Song as also depicting Christ’s love for His bride, the Church.
Song of Solomon 2:10-13: “My beloved spoke, and said to me: ‘Rise up, my love, my fair one, and come away. For lo, the winter is past, the rain is over and gone. The flowers appear on the earth; the time of singing has come, and the voice of the turtledove is heard in our land. The fig tree puts forth her green figs, and the vines with the tender grapes give a good smell. Rise up, my love, my fair one, and come away!’”
Possible Prophetic Reading:
“Rise up... and come away” could echo the upward call of the rapture
“Winter is past” could represent the end of the church age
“Time of singing” could represent heavenly worship
The imagery of spring and new life could represent resurrection and transformation
MT vs. LXX: There are no substantial differences between the Hebrew and Greek texts here that would affect interpretation.
My Caution: I include this passage because it’s often cited in rapture discussions, but I wouldn’t build doctrine on it. At best, it’s a beautiful poetic expression that may have prophetic overtones if we read the Song as also about Christ and the Church. At minimum, it captures the romantic urgency of the Bridegroom calling His bride to come away with Him, which fits the rapture motif even if it’s not explicitly about the rapture.
Part 2 of this exposition is coming. Once it’s up, this will take you there:
But in the meantime, if you’ve found this helpful or insightful, please share it with a friend who loves Scripture as much as you do.
The LXX Scrolls is free to read and always will be. If this work has been worth something to you, there are a few ways to say so:
Buy the ebooks. Completed teaching series are available as polished ebooks under the Two Witnesses, One Truth series. Buying through Curios will support this work most directly but they’re also available on Amazon (and elsewhere) if you’re loyal to a particular ereader.
Become a supporter. A monthly or annual pledge through Substack helps me to bring the Septuagint to those who never knew they needed it.
Send a one-time tip. If this post has blessed you and you want to express that directly, you can Buy Me a Coffee.
Thank you for being part of this journey, your support makes this work possible.
© 2025 LXX Scrolls. All rights reserved.